198811535 - Klickitat Fishery YKFP Design
Sponsor: Yakama Confederated Tribes
Budgets: FY07: $5,611,530 | FY08: $5,615,562 | FY09: $5,619,753
Short description: This YKFP Design & Construction proposal identifies facilities required to implement YKFP supplementation efforts and to successfully monitor results.
Final Council recommendation (Nov 2006)
Funding category: Capital
Recommended budgets: FY07: $2,500,000 | FY08: $5,000,000 | FY09: $5,000,000
Comment: Construction dependent upon favorable step review. Capital component.
Funding category: Expense
Recommended budgets: FY07: $350,000 | FY08: $350,000 | FY09: $350,000
Comment: Construction dependent upon favorable step review. Expense portion, see capital table for capital component.
ISRP final recommendation: Fundable in part
Fundable in Part to complete the Step One review including revision of the Master Plan to reflect due consideration of other alternatives. Funding is qualified, in that the completed Master Plan needs to include a “no artificial production” alternative modeled to achieve the plan’s objectives for steelhead and spring Chinook in the upper Klickitat subbasin. Modeling should provide some type of evidence (model, habitat data, EDT modeling, etc.) that shows the likelihood of achieving upper Klickitat basin objectives with and without supplementation. Modeling should evaluate the potential of a passive natural rebuilding approach over an appropriate response period, perhaps 10-12 years (~ 3 generations), that if not successful could retrigger consideration of the hatchery supplementation program proposed. A habitat-based model might predict the numbers of wild recruits necessary to fully seed the upper part of the watershed - even EDT could do that and would therefore indicate whether supplementation is needed to achieve the upper basin objectives. The ISRP is supportive of the Master Plan’s vision of separating lower river fall Chinook and coho hatchery and harvest operations from the upper river rebuilding objectives for steelhead and spring Chinook.
Response loop edit
See the sponsor's revised proposal from the response loop. You'll be taken to CBFWA's proposal system in Section 10 where most sponsors uploaded revised narratives or other responses to the ISRP comments.
State/province recommendation: Washington
Review group: Washington list
Recommended budgets: FY07: (n/a) | FY08: (n/a) | FY09: (n/a)
Comment: See Washington guidance