Comment on proposed FY 2006 budget

The budget amount should be $570,000

Accomplishments since the last review

Pend Oreille watershed (through 2004) Tributaries surveyed: 24 Km: 85.1 Reaches: 91 Fish sampling stations: 69 Lakes surveyed: 19 Monitored the Harvey Creek (Sullivan Lake) kokanee spawning population 2002-2004 Spokane/Little Spokane watersheds (through 2003) Tributaries surveyed: 23 Km: 54.3 Reaches: 213 Fish sampling stations: 287 Lakes surveyed: 0 Genetic analysis of 21 rainbow trout populations Spokane Indian Reservation (through 2003) Tributaries surveyed: 10 Km: 60.3 Reaches: 51 Fish sampling stations: 46 Lakes surveyed: 4 Data Management Created Joint Stock Assessment Project (JSAP) Unified Database (UDB) •JSAP data •Pre-existing data (<1998) •Ongoing and new project data Created JSAP data Engine •Data import utility o Upload files, append files, create tables, view relationships •Web browser interface o De-normalize, view, and download data files (under construction) JSAP UDB Procedure Manual

FY 2006 goals and anticipated accomplishments

Continue to conduct baseline fish and habitat assessments in tributaries and lakes identified as having no quantitative data within the Pend Oreille, Spokane, and Upper Columbia Subbasins. Collected data will be stored in the JSAP UDB where it can be viewed, queried, and downloaded via the internet.

Subbasin planning

How is this project consistent with subbasin plans?

Upper Columbia Subbasin Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1A1 (a, b) Page 34-6 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b, d) Page 34-8 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B4 (a) Page 34-9 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B6 (d) Page 34-10 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a) Page 34-18 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1C1 (a) Page 34-12 Spokane Subbasin Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1A1 (a, b) Page 26-6 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1A2 (a) Page 26-6 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b, c) Page 26-6, 7 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B2 (a) Page 26-7 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B3 (a) Page 26-8 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1C1 (a) Page 26-11 Spokane Subbasin Objectives1C3 (a) Page 26-11 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a, b, c) Page 26-12 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 2A2 (a) Page 26-13 Pend Oreille Subbasin Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a) Page 18-16 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 2A3 (a and b) Page 18-17 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b and c) Page 18-8 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B2 (b, c, and d) Page 18-9 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B3 (a) Page 18-9

How do goals match subbasin plan priorities?

Upper Columbia Subbasin Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a) Priority Ranking #2 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1C1 (a) Priority Ranking #5 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1A1 (a, b) Priority Ranking #7 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B6 (d) Priority Ranking #9 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b, d) Priority Ranking #10 Upper Columbia Subbasin Objectives 1B4 (a) Priority Ranking #17 Spokane Subbasin Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1A1 (a, b) Priority 1 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1A2 (a) Priority 2 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b, c) Priority 2 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B2 (a) Priority 1 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1B3 (a) Priority 4 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 1C1 (a) Priority 2 Spokane Subbasin Objectives1C3 (a) Priority 1 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a, b, c) Priority 1 Spokane Subbasin Objectives 2A2 (a) Priority 3 Pend Oreille Subbasin Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 2A1 (a) Priority 1 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 2A3 (a and b) Priority 1 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B1 (a, b and c) Priority 2 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B2 (b, c, and d) Priority 2 Pend Oreille Subbasin Objectives 1B3 (a) Priority 2

Other comments