The Council’s program is the largest regional effort to recover and protect fish and wildlife in the nation. Funded by the federal Bonneville Power Administration under authority of the 1980 Northwest Power Act, the program mitigates the impacts of hydropower dams on fish and wildlife. It also helps direct more than $250 million each year to over 350 projects throughout the Columbia River Basin.
The program envisions healthy ecosystems that sustain abundant, productive, and diverse plants and animals. To do this, the program supports protecting and restoring natural ecological systems and biological diversity as much as possible. See Ecosystems in the Program.
Wild fish are critical to preserving the genetic diversity and resiliency of salmon and steelhead. They also provide important opportunities to rebuild and reintroduce populations, with support from hatcheries. See Wild Fish in the Program.
Since habitat restoration alone can’t achieve the goals of the program, the Council supports fish hatcheries, managed according to current and evolving scientific principles, to help meet program objectives. See Hatcheries in the Program.
Ecosystem management should be adaptive and experimental. Nature is a complex, evolving system, and our understanding of it is limited. It’s critical then, for resource managers to constantly improve their knowledge and adapt to new information. See Adaptive Management in the Program.
Other key areas include a focus on water quality, especially the proliferation of toxics in our watersheds; a more aggressive approach to avian predators; preventing the spread of invasive species such as quagga and zebra mussels; and operational experiments at the federal dams.
See more priorities in the Program.
The program’s projects range from land acquisitions to protect and preserve healthy habitats; research to learn how best to rebuild naturally spawning fish populations; improvements to passage systems to assist fish movement through and around the dams; and restoration efforts to improve spawning and rearing habitats in tributaries that have been damaged by development.
A broad range of entities propose projects, including federal and state agencies, tribal governments, watershed groups, universities, private landowners, and environmental organizations. These groups also participate in the project review and selection process. To ensure accountability, all projects are required by law to undergo review by an independent scientific panel. The program also uses a second, related panel of scientists to provide advice to the region on key scientific issues, as well as an independent panel of economists to provide guidance on questions of cost-effectiveness.
The program has evolved over time from its initial focus on improving hydrosystem passage for salmon and steelhead to restoring, as much as possible, the river’s natural processes. See Project Evaluation in the Program.
Historically, the Columbia River Basin has supported a rich variety of fish and wildlife, including abundant runs of salmon and steelhead. Spawning as far upriver in the Columbia as the headwaters at Columbia Lake, British Columbia, fish migrated up the Snake River, the Columbia’s largest tributary, as far as Shoshone Falls, 615 miles from the confluence and more than 900 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Before the 1800s, annual runs were believed to have numbered between 11 and 16 million fish, but declined to about 1 million by the 1990s. Over time, the impact of development, recreation, logging, mining, agriculture, navigation and the generation of hydroelectric power have all combined to disrupt the habitat of fish and wildlife in the basin.
|1980 – Northwest Power Act is enacted|
|1982 – First Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program adopted|
|1988 – Council designates 44,000 stream miles as protected from new hydropower development|
|1991-2005 – 13 species of salmon and steelhead and two species of resident fish, bull trout and Kootenay River white sturgeon, are listed for protection under the Endangered Species Act|
|1996 – Congress passes an amendment to the Act charging the Council to conduct a public and scientific review of projects proposed for funding|
|2000 – Return to the River, the first independent scientific review of the Council’s program, calls for a shift from the program’s emphasis on individual measures to a holistic, ecosystem-based foundation|
|2004 – Council adopts local subbasin plans based on habitat measures|
|2014 – Strong returns for sockeye, fall Chinook, and coho continue favorable trends|